Understanding why clinicians answer or ignore clinical decision support prompts.
نویسندگان
چکیده
INTRODUCTION The identification of key factors influencing responses to prompts and reminders within a computer decision support system (CDSS) has not been widely studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate why clinicians routinely answer certain prompts while others are ignored. METHODS We utilized data collected from a CDSS developed by our research group--the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system. The main outcome of interest was whether a clinician responded to a prompt. RESULTS This study found that, as expected, some clinics and physicians were more likely to address prompts than others. However, we also found clinicians are more likely to address prompts for younger patients and when the prompts address more serious issues. The most striking finding was that the position of a prompt was a significant predictor of the likelihood of the prompt being addressed, even after controlling for other factors. Prompts at the top of the page were significantly more likely to be answered than the ones on the bottom. CONCLUSIONS This study detailed a number of factors that are associated with physicians following clinical decision support prompts. This information could be instrumental in designing better interventions and more successful clinical decision support systems in the future.
منابع مشابه
Review Paper: What Evidence Supports the Use of Computerized Alerts and Prompts to Improve Clinicians' Prescribing Behavior?
Alerts and prompts represent promising types of decision support in electronic prescribing to tackle inadequacies in prescribing. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of computerized drug alerts and prompts searching EMBASE, CINHAL, MEDLINE, and PsychINFO up to May 2007. Studies assessing the impact of electronic alerts and prompts on clinicians' prescribing behavior were ...
متن کاملPediatricians' responses to printed clinical reminders: does highlighting prompts improve responsiveness?
OBJECTIVE Physicians typically respond to roughly half of the clinical decision support prompts they receive. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that selectively highlighting prompts in yellow would improve physicians' responsiveness. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial using the Child Health Improvement Through Computer Automation clinical decision support system i...
متن کاملBeyond Compassion: Replacing a Blame Culture With Proper Emotional Support and Management; Comment on “Why and How Is Compassion Necessary to Provide Good Quality Healthcare?”
The absence of compassion, argues the author, is not the cause of healthcare failures but rather a symptom of deeper systemic failures. The clinical encounter arouses strong emotions of anxiety, fear, and anger in patients which are often projected onto the clinicians. Attempts to protect clinicians through various bureaucratic devices and depersonalization of the patient, constitute as Menzies...
متن کاملExploring PDA Usage by Iranian Residents and Interns: A Qualitative Study
Background and Objectives: Clinicians in many countries increasingly use Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) as an assisting tool in clinical practice. The pattern of PDA usage by clinicians in Iran has not been characterized. This study explored the attitudes of Iranian residents and interns toward medical uses of PDA. Methods: An interview-based qualitative study was carried out in 2011. A p...
متن کاملMaking the Right Thing Easier to Do.
Making the Right Thing Easier to Do t the Care Management Institute (CMI), our guiding philosophy is to make the right thing easier to do, and the implementation of KP HealthConnect expands dramatically the possibilities for us to make this philosophy a reality. With the advent of KP HealthConnect, we have at our disposal new tools to answer our perennial question: How can we most effectively s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Applied clinical informatics
دوره 3 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012